HOME PAGE
 
HOME PAGE

SeniorHealthWeek
Acid Reflux
Alzheimer's
Arthritis
Bladder Control
Breast Cancer
Cholesterol
Colorectal Cancer
Depression
Diabetes
Eye Disease
Heart Disease
Hypertension
Joint Replacement
Lung Cancer
Menopause
Osteoporosis
Parkinson's
Prostate Cancer
Skin Cancer
Senior Health Report: Parkinson's
Health News You Can Use •

Parkinson's News:

Study: Levodopa and Pramipexole Both Reasonable Options in Treating Parkinson's

The drugs levodopa and pramipexole both are reasonable options as initial therapy for Parkinson disease, but they vary in effectiveness and adverse effects, according to a report in the July issue of the Archives of Neurology .

Parkinson disease is a progressive neurologic disease that may be related to low levels of dopamine in certain parts of the brain. Levodopa is converted in the body to dopamine, while pramipexole mimics the role of dopamine in the brain.

Researcher Robert G. Holloway, MD, of the University of Rochester, and his colleagues compared initial treatment with pramipexole versus levodopa in 301 patients with early Parkinson disease.

Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of developing dyskinesias or uncontrollable body movements and significant reduction in wearing off when compared with levodopa.

On the other hand, initial levodopa treatment when compared with the other drug resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of “freezing” of motor function and also lower incidences of sleepiness and excess fluid in the tissues, while providing for better control of Parkinson symptoms.

By 48 months, the researchers noted that the occurrence of disabling dyskinesias was uncommon and did not significantly differ between the two groups. Both treatment options resulted in similar quality of life.

The researchers said the differences between the two drugs make it impossible to favor one over the other.

“Both pramipexole and levodopa appear to be reasonable options as initial dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson disease,” they added. “Long-term follow-up is needed to determine if either treatment strategy is superior to the other in terms of patient impairment, disability or quality of life.”

Source: Medical Week staff, week of July 19, 2004

 

About This Site
Privacy Policy
Advertising Policy
Contact Us

USE OF THIS SITE SIGNIFIES ACCEPTANCE OF THIS USER AGREEMENT: The information provided in this and our other sites is for educational purposes only, and it is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult your own physician or healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Hypertext links to other sites are for the convenience of our Web site viewers and do not constitute any endorsement. We are not responsible for the content of linked sites in any way. This site is intended for personal use only and may not be used for any commercial purpose.