|
Harvard
Medical School researchers have added to the growing body
of evidence that clot-busting drugs known as thrombolytics
increase the overall risk of death for the very oldest patients.
The study,
published in the March 11 Archives of Internal Medicine, found
that eligible patients between the ages of 80 and 90 who received
such drugs had a 40 percent greater risk of death in the hospital
compared with patients who did not receive the drug.
The researchers
examined records of 2,659 patients with acute myocardial infarction
admitted to 37 Minnesota community hospitals from 1992 to
1996. Of this group, 719 patients were eligible for thrombolytic
therapy according to the guidelines.
The study
found several reasons why elderly patients may not share the
benefits of this therapy seen in younger patients. The elderly
are more likely to have contraindications, their risks for
bleeding and stroke are markedly increased and they tend to
experience longer delays between symptom onset and hospitalization
that substantially reduce the drugs' effect on survival.
"The
oldest patients, even those without contraindications to therapy,
experienced an excess risk of mortality compared with untreated
patients," the authors write. "Findings of this
study suggest a need to re-assess our approach to the use
of thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial
infarction patients older than 75 years."
A study
from John Hopkins University, reported on in the May 16, 2000
Circulation, showed similar results: patients over age 75
who got thrombolytic drugs were nearly 40 percent more likely
to die within 30 days than patients not receiving the drugs.
The Harvard
Medical School research suggests that national guidelines
on the use of these drugs such as streptokinase and tissue
plasminogen activator should be applied with greater selectivity,
and possibly revised, to maximize benefit and minimize risk
due to bleeding or stroke, said lead author Stephen Soumerai,
professor of ambulatory care and prevention at Harvard Medical
School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
Soumerai
told Medical Week that the study means that physicians should
"certainly be more vigilant" in selecting appropriate
candidates for treatment regardless of age.
"Doctors
should be more certain than they have been in prescribing
drugs to the oldest patients," Soumerai said, while adding
that he and his colleagues would never go as far as to issue
a blanket recommendation that such drugs should never be prescribed
to such patients. "A physician has to use his or her
judgment. That's what we're saying."
Soumerai
said family members advocating for an elderly heart attack
victim should take into account all of the existing data that
questions the efficacy of clot-busting drugs on the oldest
patients.
For family
members accompanying a loved one having a heart attack to
the hospital, Soumerai said they could speak to the staff
based on their knowledge of the data, express their opinions
and have a shared discussion with physicians. He said family
members that have seen the studies might attempt to dissuade
the use of such drugs in the oldest and most frail patients.
Source:
Heart
Disease Week of March 17, 2002
|